Menu
Log in


from our SCOPE membership

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
  • 06/01/2026 2:35 PM | Anonymous

    May 2026 SCOPE Activities

        May 2026 was a very busy month, but before we discuss those activities, I want to warn New York gun owners about a new development in the Second Amendment genre.  

        Normalcy bias is a psychological phenomenon where people believe that things will continue as they always have.  It leads people to underestimate the likelihood of disasters or significant changes.  This bias can result in inadequate preparation for emergencies or crises.  Normalcy bias can hinder effective response and recovery during significant events. 

        When discussing important constitutional issues with gun owners, it is common to hear comments such as, “That will never happen here,” or “I don’t own that type of rifle, so it doesn’t affect me.” Unfortunately, this mindset overlooks how restrictions imposed on one category of firearms can eventually expand to affect others.

        In what many gun owners view as an ongoing effort to mirror California’s restrictive firearm policies; New York residents are now finding that developments in other states can have implications beyond their own borders. One state that deserves close attention is Oregon.

        Oregon Initiative Petition 28, commonly referred to as the PEACE Act, would eliminate Oregon’s legal exemptions for activities such as hunting, fishing, trapping, livestock farming, and pest control. Supporters of the measure have gathered enough signatures to place it on the November ballot.

    Opponents argue that, if approved, the initiative would effectively prohibit hunting and fishing in Oregon by removing longstanding legal protections for those activities. As a result, gun owners, hunters, and anglers in New York should pay close attention to this proposal and remain vigilant against similar efforts that could emerge in their own state.

    New York State Republican Women’s Conference – May 3-4 2026

        Bo Rabarski, Steve Leonard, and I attended the New York State Republican Women’s Conference on May 4, 2026, in Albany, New York. The event was a full-day conference featuring a number of distinguished speakers and candidates.

        Among the featured speakers were Saritha Komatireddy, a candidate for New York State Attorney General challenging Letitia James, and Joseph Hernandez, a candidate for New York State Comptroller running against Tom DiNapoli. Both candidates delivered informative presentations outlining their visions and priorities for New York State.

    Following the conference, both Saritha Komatireddy and Joseph Hernandez were invited to speak at the 2026 SCOPE Banquet.

        The day’s events concluded with a dinner attended by approximately 350 guests. The featured speakers were Bruce Blakeman, a candidate for Governor of New York, and Lara Logan, an award-winning independent journalist.

        Both speakers delivered engaging remarks, but Lara Logan particularly energized the audience with a powerful speech emphasizing the importance of civic engagement and voter participation in the upcoming November election. Her message resonated strongly with attendees and provided a memorable conclusion to the conference.

    Met with the New York State Assembly Leader Mr. Ed Ra – May 13, 2026

        On May 13, 2026, Jack Prendergast, Bo Rabarski, Jim Krywalski, Tom Reynolds, Dave Volt (a SCOPE member), and I met with Assembly Minority Leader Ed Ra and his staff in Albany, New York. The purpose of the meeting was to brief Mr. Ra and his team on SCOPE’s Top Ten Most Egregious Firearms Bills currently before the New York State Legislature.

        The timing of the briefing was particularly important. The period between the completion of the state budget process and the end of the legislative session on June 30 is often the most active and potentially concerning time for firearms legislation. Historically, this is when the Legislature has advanced gun control measures, sometimes with little notice and during late-night sessions.

        Several valuable outcomes emerged from the discussion. Mr. Ra committed to notifying SCOPE when any of the bills on SCOPE’s Top Ten list were scheduled for a vote. He also provided recommendations on Assembly members with whom SCOPE should engage regarding firearms-related legislation.

        The meeting was productive, informative, and lasted approximately one hour. It reinforced the importance of SCOPE maintaining a regular presence in Albany. An annual visit to brief both Senate and Assembly leadership on the most significant firearms legislation remains an essential part of SCOPE’s legislative outreach efforts.

    SCOPE Board of Directors Meeting – May 14, 2026

        A SCOPE Board of Directors meeting was held on May 14, 2026, with all but three board members in attendance. Under normal circumstances, the Board meets quarterly in January, April, July, and October. However, in light of SCOPE’s Get Out the Vote Initiative (GOTVI), the Board voted to increase the frequency of its meetings and will convene monthly through the November election.

        The decision reflects the importance of maintaining close oversight and coordination of GOTVI activities during the election cycle, ensuring the organization remains focused on its voter engagement and outreach efforts.

        Two significant topics were discussed during the meeting.

        First, the Board approved an update to SCOPE’s mission statement. The new mission statement reads:

        "The mission of S.C.O.P.E., Inc. is to restore and protect the Second Amendment rights of New Yorkers."

        In support of this mission, the Board also adopted three core organizational pillars:

    1) Educating policymakers and law-abiding citizens on the meaning, value, and importance of the Second Amendment.

    2) Collaborating with like-minded organizations to oppose and prevent laws that infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms.

    3) Mobilizing voters to elect leaders who will steadfastly defend the Second Amendment and uphold constitutional rights.

        The second major topic was a briefing on SCOPE’s Get Out the Vote Initiative (GOTVI) for the upcoming gubernatorial election. Steve Leonard, SCOPE’s newly appointed Marketing and Communications Director, provided a detailed overview of the campaign strategy. The initiative includes a comprehensive social media outreach effort, as well as the development and distribution of promotional materials to county chapters. These materials will be shared with local gun clubs, Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs), sportsmen’s federations, conservation councils, and other allied organizations throughout the state to encourage voter participation and engagement.

    Attended Chapter Meetings – May 18 and 19, 2026

        Jefferson/Lewis Chapter of SCOPE: I attended the Jefferson/Lewis County Chapter of SCOPE meeting on May 18 at the Watertown Sportsmen’s Club. Several important topics were discussed, including SCOPE’s Get Out the Vote Initiative (GOTVI) and efforts to increase voter participation among gun owners in the upcoming November election. Members also reviewed the responsibilities of individual county chapters in supporting the initiative.

        Additional discussion focused on SCOPE’s priorities and objectives for 2026–2027, as well as planning for the organization’s presence at Brownville Days, scheduled for May 29–31. Meeting participants reviewed logistical details and volunteer responsibilities for staffing and operating the SCOPE information/fund raising table during the event.

        The Chautauqua County Chapter of SCOPE held its monthly meeting on May 19, 2026. Tom Reynolds and I attended the meeting, which was led by Chapter Coordinator Will Conta.

        A number of candidates seeking elected office addressed the membership and outlined their qualifications, priorities, and reasons they believed they deserved the chapter’s support in the upcoming election.

        At the conclusion of the candidate presentations, I provided an update on SCOPE’s Get Out the Vote Initiative (GOTVI) and discussed the organization’s priorities and objectives for 2026–2027. The presentation emphasized the importance of voter engagement among Second Amendment supporters and highlighted SCOPE’s strategic efforts to protect and advance the rights of New York gun owners. 

    Meeting with the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association (NYSRPA) President Tom King – Thursday May 28, 2026

        On May 28, 2026, Jack Prendergast and I traveled to Waterloo, New York, to meet with Tom King for an initial planning session. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss and coordinate efforts aimed at increasing voter participation among gun owners in the upcoming November election.

        The meeting was productive and lasted approximately two hours. Participants exchanged ideas, reviewed potential strategies, and identified the GOTVI as an area of collaboration. As a result of the discussion, a follow-up meeting was scheduled for June to further develop and refine the initiative.

    Brownville Field Days – 29-31 May, 2026

        Brownville Field Days is a three-day festival with carnival rides, vendors, a car show, and crafts.  The Jefferson/Lewis County Chapter of SCOPE set up an informational table distributing SCOPE’s Top Ten Most Egregious Firearms Legislation list, U.S. Constitutions, and voting registration forms.  Additionally, funds were raised with a gun raffle.  Bruce Kingsley’s SWAMP BUGGY was outfitted with U.S. flags and SCOPE banners and was a hit in the Brownville Field Days parade.  SCOPE members walked alongside the SWAMP BUGGY handing out small American flags to the kids.  It was a good three-day event beginning the fund-raising season for the chapter. 

    Conclusion

        Summer is traditionally a busy time for SCOPE chapters, as it marks the height of the fundraising season. This year, however, chapter activities will be even more demanding due to the implementation of SCOPE’s Get Out the Vote (GOTV) Initiative.

        As the details of the GOTV Initiative continue to take shape, county chapters should begin developing plans for distributing GOTV materials to local gun clubs, Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs), sportsmen’s organizations, and conservation councils. Our objective is clear: to encourage gun owners who do not regularly participate in elections to vote in this year’s gubernatorial election. Expanding voter participation among Second Amendment supporters will be critical to the success of our efforts.

        Thank you for everything you do to support and defend the Second Amendment. During my visits to chapters across the state, I consistently encourage each member to recruit one new member each year. I ask that you continue striving toward that goal. Growing our membership strengthens our voice, expands our influence, and enhances our ability to protect the rights we all value.

        Thank you for your continued dedication and support.   

    John Elwood
    SCOPE President


  • 05/27/2026 12:32 PM | Anonymous

    Spencer Pratt  by Tom Reynolds

    Spencer Pratt’s is a Republican campaigning to be the Mayor of Los Angeles.

    In an interview with CNN, Elex Michaelson asked Pratt; “Why are you a Republican?

    Pratt replied, “Well, you want to break some news here?”.

    “Sure.”

    Pratt answered; “…Everyone’s gonna freak out. When I was a hated reality star, I got so many death threats. I had so much security and police, and what did they tell me to do? Get a gun. This is real, I know people don’t like guns, but LA was dangerous if you’re hated. So, I got a gun. My wife got a gun. And then we needed CCWs. The only people that supported a CCW was the Republican.”

    He added; “That was what I aligned with my safety, my personal safety, my family’s safety.  I know people don’t like guns, but when people are threatening your life and your own security is telling you, you need to have home protection, trained too.”

    I have no idea who Pratt is or what his reality show was but he got it right on self-defense.

    And speaking of the Los Angeles Mayor…

    The current L A Mayor, Karen Bass, is running for re-election.  In an interview with the same Elex Michaelson, Bass was asked, “So, when you talked to Jake Tapper in 2023, you said that your goal was to end street homelessness in LA by 2026. It’s now 2026 and we haven’t ended it. How are you so off?”

    Bass answered; “We haven’t ended it. Basically, when I said that, it was at the beginning of my term. I am very committed to achieving that goal. I didn’t anticipate some of the bureaucratic barriers that I would experience, but I am prepared to take those on now.”

    The Bureaucracy is to blame!

    Perhaps, Bass can identify with what Donald Trump faced with the Swamp when he took over as President and why he ‘cleaned house’ (especially in the ATF.)

    Oh yeah, Bass’ handling of the wildfires and subsequent rebuilding has not been described as terrific, either.  And I believe bureaucracy is being blamed for that, too.

    Question: which political party is pro bureaucracy and believes that government, through bureaucracies, can make better personal decisions than the citizens themselves?  Hint:  Karen Bass belongs to it.


  • 05/27/2026 11:04 AM | Anonymous

    The youngest are the next victims of gun control!  by Bohdan Rabarsky

    The days of a youngster finding a Daisy BB gun under the Christmas tree may soon be fading if Democrat law makers in Albany have their way. Senator Rachel May sponsored Senate bill S9215 and Assemblywoman Gabriella Romero sponsored Assembly bill A10701, both of which would prohibit anyone under 18 years of age from purchasing what they refer to as “imitation weapons;” a BB gun, air rifle, pellet gun. The barrels would have to be brightly colored and plugged so they wouldn’t be able to fire a projectile.

    The manufacturer of the Daisy BB gun was established in 1882 as the Plymouth Iron Windmill Company.  In 1888, it started building BB caliber air rifles.  Since its introduction in the spring of 1940, their Red Ryder BB Gun has been featured in TV shows and movies.  After over 140 unmolested years, the BB gun is in danger.

    To this day, youngsters have been brought up asking for BB guns and Dads have been teaching their children how to use them, educate them on their safety and teaching them marksmanship while shooting at tin cans.

    Until now, the anti-gun left has not had any luck at banning guns in New York State by amending, removing or circumventing the 2nd Amendment.  But, none of the guns listed in these bills are covered by the 2nd Amendment as the left is not coming for the guns, they’re aiming at the underlying gun culture. The left’s best alternative to radical gun control is to bring up a generation of youth that has no personal and emotional connection to firearms.  A generation that did not have a BB gun passed down from their father or have a family tradition of shooting BBs in their backyard.

    And even scarier to the left is that girls are breaking the male stereotype and entering the gun culture, creating even more potential defenders of the 2nd Amendment.             

    The left hopes that this new generation will vote away their rights without a fight because they have no connection to that backyard firearm and no connection to the 2nd Amendment.

    The BB gun isn’t just a toy to amuse children, it’s the gateway to start a young child’s love of shooting. It’s where the 2nd Amendment Right gets its foundation, becomes personal, and teaches a young person how to defend that right.  Without that foundation, they will be the first generation that’ll never know SCOPE (Shooters Committee on Political Education), the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America or the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association.

    Let the legislators in Albany know how much you oppose S9215 and A10701.

    NYS Assembly
                                
    NYS Senate    

  • 05/20/2026 2:20 PM | Anonymous

    Drawings Are Dangerous and Unusual Arms?  by Tom Reynolds

    Scope wrote about a proposed NY State law to ban BB guns.*  David Codrea wrote in Ammoland about another issue which is even dumber; the liberal left that has taken over the public-school systems have declared war on gun images.  Not just real guns but any image of a gun sends shivers down whatever spines the liberal left still have left.  Here are some examples, which Codrea highlights, that would be amusing if not so stupid:  

     A fourth-grade boy, playing with LEGOs, faced suspension over the two-inch toy gun carried by a policeman LEGO figure; a toy gun carried by a doll.  Doubling down on stupidity, Margie Feinberg, a spokeswoman for the Department of Education said that there is a no-tolerance policy for toy guns in schools.

    A high school senior in Connecticut was suspended and arrested after posting a photo of an airsoft gun** on Snapchat.

    In Ohio, a middle school student received a 10-day suspension for “liking” a photo of an airsoft gun on Instagram.

    A 16-year-old student in Alabama was expelled from school after she was caught with a toy water gun.

    A 12-year-old autistic boy was arrested last week for pointing an imaginary rifle at his art teacher.

    In the notorious Pop Tart gun case, a seven-year-old boy in Maryland bit a pastry in the shape of a gun - and had his suspension upheld by a judge.

    A three-year-old deaf boy in Nebraska, named Hunter, was forbidden to use sign language for his name because the ASL sign for Hunter slightly resembled the ASL sign for a gun.  It also resembled a finger gun that children might make during a game of cops and robbers.

    If you think banning drawings of guns is over-the-edge, in some cases schools are only reflecting the idiocy of progressive parents.  Growing Up in Santa Cruz (California) shows what “progressive” mothers have to say:

    Gina Grajewski, a Santa Cruz parent, agrees that no guns should be drawn in the classroom under any circumstance. “No guns at school. No drawings. Period. No gun play. Period. No guns. Period.”

    Santa Cruz parent Kathy Vega, also wants no gun pictures in schools. “I agree with the rules of not drawing guns or weapons at school…If anything, we should try to educate our children not to touch guns in hopes that they will make that decision if they happen to be in a situation where they have access to one.”  (only predators would have the same qualms about guns…)

    Of course, kids make decisions based on what is new, exciting and enticing; like guns with which they have no experience.  The unintended consequence of this ‘mandated ignorance’ will be that kids will have no clue about basic rules of gun safety. If children encounter an unattended firearm, tragedy will be the likely result.

    One-way kids learn is by observation and kids have learned about guns in movies and on TV.  For instance, it’s easy to disarm a person pointing a gun at you and most shots only end up as “flesh wounds,” which hardly impact the victim. (Sarcasm intended.)

    And the liberal lunacy is not confined to guns.  In Wisconsin, a 7 year-old boy was arrested for sexual harassment because he used the wrong pronoun!

    * S.C.O.P.E. Shooters Committee On Political Education - They’re Coming After Your (BB) Gun by Tom Reynolds

    ** Air soft guns look like real guns but fire plastic pellets or bb’s by compressed gas or air.


  • 05/19/2026 12:39 PM | Anonymous

    Less Pay to Play  by Tom Reynolds

    SCOPE has often written about big government taking, at both the state and federal level, the position about passing unconstitutional laws: If you don’t like it, sue me - if you can afford thousands of dollars to spend on legal costs.

    To counter this, in a boost for 2nd Amendment defenders, Trump’s DOJ’ started a 2nd Amendment Section of the Civil Rights Division; a gun rights-focused section.  One of its focuses will be fighting a variety of state and local courts on gun issues, particularly difficulties around concealed carry permits.  The federal government can now finance law suits that private citizens previously had to finance.*

    The idea of, if you don’t like it, sue me, just took another body blow.

    Private citizen Donald Trump had filed litigation against the federal government, seeking compensation for various wrongs (allegedly) committed against him, mostly during the Biden presidency.  There is an announced tentative settlement in the case.  Trump is reportedly dropping his $10 billion lawsuit against the I R S in exchange for the creation of a $1.7 billion fund to compensate those who claim they were wrongfully targeted by the Biden administration.  The settlement is expected to be agreed upon soon and the final terms will not be set until they are officially announced. 

    Perhaps FFL’s and other 2A people that were victimized by Biden (or whoever was in charge in the White House) can take advantage of this to stay in the fight for 2A rights.          

    As you might expect about all things Donald Trump, the New York Times is having a “cow.”  They call it an “unusual plan” and “a political slush fund.”

    Apparently, the NY Times is in such dire financial straits that its editors cannot afford a dictionary.  Unusual is defined as: uncommon; extraordinary; abnormal; rare.

    One example, of many, the NY Times missed.  After the 2008/09 recession, the Obama administration brought a series of cases blaming the recession on big banks. All the banks settled, many for billions of dollars.  In one settlement, the Bank of America allocated $7 billion to slush funds doled out to delinquent debtors and to left-wing advocacy groups friendly to the administration and Democrat Party.

    Sounds like this sort of thing is common, ordinary, usual and not rare.  As the Manhattan Contrarian wrote: The only thing unusual is the use of this strategy by a Republican President. It took him a while, but it looks like he finally figured out that two can play this game.

    Two can play this game” or as is often said, whatever the Democrat Party is accusing you of doing, they are already doing themselves.

    The NY Times could be classified as a Democrat propaganda arm.  (I love using “arm” in connection with the NY Times; does the 2nd Amendment cover their work for the Democrat Party?)

    It’s too bad that tax dollars have to be used to defend taxpayers against the government.  But this case is not - as in the Obama example – being used to push a government policy but, instead, to defend against a government policy. 

    * S.C.O.P.E. Shooters Committee On Political Education - DOJ’s 2nd Amendment Section


  • 05/15/2026 12:08 PM | Anonymous

    You be the Jury  by Tom Reynolds

    On TV, the crime story usually ends with no doubt as to who committed the crime.  In real life, it’s circumstantial evidence that convicts a criminal. 

    I applied that same theory to testing the impact that gun owners might have on gubernatorial elections in New York State.  I used the last 3 NYS Governor’s elections to test if the pro-gun Republican could have won if gun owners turned out to vote under various scenarios.  There are knowns and there are unknowns so we fill the gaps with circumstantial evidence.  I don’t want to bury you in statistics so I’ll explain as simply as possible.

    We know Democrat governor candidates were anti-gun and the Republican governor candidates were pro-gun. 

    We know what New York State’s population was and how many people were at least 18 years old and, thus, potentially eligible to vote.

    We know how many people were registered active voters in NYS.

    We know how many votes were cast in the last three governor’s elections and what percentage of active registered voters actually voted.

    We know how many votes the Republican candidate got and by how much they lost the election.

    If we mix knowns and unknowns together in possible scenarios, we can get a better idea of whether gun owners voting makes a difference.    

    These are the estimates of unknowns that I used: 

    Estimates of NYS gun owners range between 5 million to 3 million and, by law, they must be 18 or older, so they could potentially vote.  I ran 5 scenarios using between 5 million and 3 million in each of the three elections.

    67% of those eligible to vote in NYS are active registered voters. All scenarios projected what would have happened if 67% of the gun owners who are eligible to vote would be registered to vote.*

    I ran five scenarios where the Republican got between 60% and 80% of the gun owners votes in each election. **

    I ran five scenarios with gun owners making up from 50% to 30% of the Republican candidate’s actual votes in each election.***

    I ran five voter participation scenarios where between 50% and 30% of gun owners who are registered to vote actually voted.**** 

    What were the results when the above are mixed together?  Of 25 possible scenarios in each election:

    In 2022, the pro Republican won 20 times and came close 1 other time.

    In 2018, The Republican won 2 times and came close 2 other times.

    In 2014, the Republican won 21 times and came close 2 other times.

    There’s an 80% chance that the Republican, pro-gun candidate would have won two of the last three elections - if gun owners had turned out to vote.

    *We know that about 67% of those eligible to vote in NYS are active registered voters.  There are 5 million to 3 million gun owners and if 67% of them registered to vote that would be 3.35 million to 2 million voters.  

    ** I assumed that gun owners are more likely to vote Republican – for reasons beyond just gun ownership - but no one knows what percentage of the gun owners’ votes actually go to Republicans. Less than 60% won’t make a difference and more than 80% seems too high.

    *** We know how many votes the Republican candidate got and it doesn’t seem possible that more than half of them were from gun owners. 

    **** The voter participation rates in the last 4 governor’s elections were 49% (2022) 53% (2018) 36% (2014) 44% (2010).  I once saw a study that said between 50% and 30% of hunters vote. 


  • 05/11/2026 5:16 PM | Anonymous

    When is a right not a right?  by Ron Havlen

    I am taking the online NYS driver’s courses offered to help reduce car insurance expenses. During this course, I’ve come upon a section about assuming an inherent right to drive. This section really struck me.

    I’m going to be careful to avoid using the direct wording in this section to avoid any copyright infringements. 

    This section deals with people who believe they have an inherent right to drive.  It states that if driving were a right, people couldn’t be required to show they have the skill, ability and knowledge to operate a car safely. If driving were a right, people couldn’t be required to take any tests or show skill levels before getting a license to drive. If driving were a right, anyone could drive a car, regardless of skill.

    NYS corrects that assumption and goes on to say that driving in NYS is a privilege, not a right. And because it’s a privilege, drivers are subject to a number of penalties including the loss of driving privileges. And that licenses are not available just because you reach a certain age; it is an earned privilege.

    Hmm. “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

    It surely seems to me that, according to that sentence in the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, that owning and using arms is a recognized right of ‘we the people.’

    New York is certainly applying the term of privilege to firearms ownership, and trampling all over the rights of the people.

    Do we agree that firearms owners should get training and practice in using their arms? Of course. But does that mean that New York State should mandate such training to its own self-serving standards?  I answer strongly no to the current and proposed requirements because these requirements are designed not for safety and skill, but rather to create barriers - both physical and financial - to ‘we the people’ being able to own their own arms.

    Privileges give the state power while rights give the citizens power.  New York State surely understands the difference between a right and a privilege when it gives the state more power, as in issuing drivers’ licenses.  As to guns, New York State wouldn’t recognize the difference between a right and a privilege if it was smacked in the face. 

    The question is, do we the people recognize that difference and are we willing to do something in defense of that right?


  • 05/09/2026 5:58 PM | Anonymous

    S.C.O.P.E. Participation at the NYSFRW 107th Annual Conference & Dinner Gala

    On May 4, 2026, representatives from S.C.O.P.E. Inc. attended the New York State Federated Republican Women (NYSFRW) 107th Annual Conference & Dinner Gala in Albany. 

    The conference brought together approximately 350 Republican leaders, candidates, conservative organizations, and grassroots supporters from across New York State for a day of networking, discussion, and strategic engagement ahead of the 2026 election cycle.

    Representing S.C.O.P.E. at the conference were:

    • John Elwood – President
    • Bohdan (Bo) Rabarsky – 1st Vice President and Chair of the Oneida-Herkimer Chapter
    • Steve Leonard – Director of Marketing and Communications

    S.C.O.P.E. Information Table

    S.C.O.P.E. manned an information table providing attendees with educational materials, membership resources, and opportunities to discuss Second Amendment topics.

    The information table generated good attendee interest and provided an opportunity to increase awareness of S.C.O.P.E.’s organization, ongoing initiatives, and grassroots efforts.  The event also resulted in several new memberships, including a new lifetime member from Brooklyn, NY.

    Conversations throughout the day highlighted the importance of increased collaboration between constitutional rights organizations, and the critical need for a strong statewide Get Out the Vote (GOTV) campaign to mobilize an estimated 1.2 million gun owners who did not participate in the 2022 election.

    Engagement with Republican Candidates

    During the conference, S.C.O.P.E. representatives had the opportunity to personally meet with several prominent Republican candidates, including:

    • Todd Hood — Lieutenant Governor
    • Saritha Komatireddy — Attorney General
    • Joseph Hernandez — Comptroller

    These discussions provided valuable opportunities to share S.C.O.P.E.’s perspectives on Second Amendment issues, lack of voter engagement, and the importance of mobilizing grassroots supporters throughout New York State.  All three candidates expressed strong support for the Second Amendment rights of New Yorkers and thanked S.C.O.P.E. for the work the organization is doing.

    Dinner Gala & Keynote Speakers

    The conference concluded with an evening Dinner Gala featuring keynote addresses from:

    • Bruce Blakeman – New York State Republican Gubernatorial Candidate
    • Lara Logan – Award winning investigative journalist

     Bruce Blakeman addressed attendees on several key topics including terminating New York sanctuary state policies, reducing electric bills by 50% by reversing expensive and ineffective green energy mandates, eliminating billions of dollars in spending accommodating illegal immigrants, backing our police and corrections officers, and bringing common-sense policies back to Albany.

     While Blakeman did not specifically address the Second Amendment during his remarks, he clearly outlined his strong support for the Second Amendment during a prior address at the S.C.O.P.E. members meeting on April 18th in Montour Falls, NY

    Lara Logan delivered a high-impact address drawing from her extensive journalism and international reporting experience.

    Logan is an award-winning investigative journalist.  She was a correspondent for 60 Minutes and Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent for CBS News, where she reported extensively from conflict zones including Afghanistan and Iraq.  She currently hosts the podcast Going Rogue with Lara Logan, which focuses on investigative reporting, current events, and political commentary. 

    Logan issued a sobering warning: the window to save New York from the grip of radical, far-left ideology, and the steady march toward socialism and communism is rapidly closing.  Her message was clear — if New Yorkers fail to rise up, organize, and fight with greater determination for the constitutional principles and freedoms upon which this nation was founded, the battle for New York will soon be lost.

    She challenged those in attendance to reject complacency, stand up, mobilize, work even harder, and recognize that the fight for New York is not just political — it is a fight for freedom, and survival of the values that made America exceptional.  More importantly, it is a fight to preserve those freedoms and opportunities for our children and grandchildren, ensuring future generations inherit a state — and a nation — grounded in liberty, personal responsibility, and the enduring principles put forth by America’s founders.

    Importance of S.C.O.P.E.’s Participation

    Attendance at the NYSFRW Annual Conference provided S.C.O.P.E. with important visibility among Republican leaders and candidates, while also creating valuable networking opportunities. 

    By participating in statewide political and advocacy events, S.C.O.P.E. continues to expand relationships, increase organizational awareness, and ensure that Second Amendment issues remain part of broader discussions involving New York’s future leadership and policy direction.

    S.C.O.P.E.’s leadership sincerely appreciates the continued support of our members across New York State.  Your time, effort, and dedication play an important role in strengthening our organization, expanding our outreach, and encouraging greater voter awareness and participation.

    As we prepare this summer to celebrate 250 years of liberty in America, one thing is clear: history was written by those who showed up.  Our founders stood for liberty in 1776.  Today, 250 years later, it is ours to protect — at the ballot box.  Now it’s our turn.  Show up.  Be counted.  It matters more than ever.

    In Liberty,

    Steve Leonard
    Director of Marketing and Communications
    S.C.O.P.E. Inc.


  • 05/05/2026 11:25 AM | Anonymous

    Gerrymandering  by Tom Reynolds

    No one can contest it (no sane person) when I state that the Democrat Party leadership wants to do away with our 2nd Amendment rights and to do that they will try anything, direct or indirect.  We are about to see another indirect attempt that could be more dangerous than any of the proposed bills that directly threaten 2A.  

    New York Democrats’ gerrymandering frenzy was reignited after the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) struck down race-based redistricting.  Basically, a state can’t gerrymander congressional districts based on race.  Democrats are accusing Republicans of bringing back ‘Jim Crow Laws’ because Republicans are against racism.  Do you understand that?

    The Babylon Bee got it right: "In Blow To Democrats, SCOTUS Rules They Have To Stop Being Racist."

    But NY Governor Kathy Hochul saw it differently; as usual, Trump was the devil behind all sin.  She said the justices were “clearly carrying out Donald Trump’s will with this decision… I’m working with the Legislature to change New York’s redistricting process so we can fight back against Washington’s attempts to rig our democracy.”

    Hochul’s not kidding.  Remember, her misnamed ‘Concealed Carry Improvement Act’ was passed in reaction to another SCOTUS decision.

    This will not be Hochul’s and her Democrat cohorts first turn at bat.

    In March, the U S Supreme Court halted a lawsuit that aimed to eliminate New York City’s only GOP House and make it Democrat.  That Democrat effort argued that the 11th Congressional District (Staten Island mostly) disenfranchised minority voters - even though the Republican holding that office is a Latina.

    The NY State Constitution restricts partisan gerrymandering because, when Republicans controlled the NY Senate in 2014, a constitutional amendment was overwhelmingly approved by voters, after passing in the Legislature with bipartisan support.  That amendment created an independent redistricting commission, to draw district lines once a decade, after the federal Census.

    After taking control of both houses of the Legislature in 2019, Democrats put forward an amendment that would have gutted those NY Constitution’s anti-gerrymandering safeguards, that were approved in 2014.  But their scheme was stopped by the voters! When the amendment went before the public in the 2021 general election, it lost and the 2014 protections against partisan gerrymandering remain in effect today.  (In the 2021 election, the voters also rejected Democrat amendments that would have allowed for same-day voter registration and no-excuse absentee voting.)

    Last summer, Democrats started again.  They introduced another constitutional amendment that would allow Albany to redraw New York’s Congressional Districts whenever another state conducts a mid-decade redistricting.  A09014 and S08467 still need approval by two consecutively elected Legislatures, as well as the voters.

    In heavily Democrat majority legislatures, passing them is the easy part.  But getting the state’s voters to go along with such a partisan constitutional amendment might not be as easy; remember 2021.

    If Democrats succeed in their gerrymandering and can regain control in D C, you can bet-the-farm that they will come against the 2nd Amendment with everything they have at their disposal. 

    A vote in time…saves 2A and the other nine. (Amendments in the Bill of Rights.)

    Okay, I am not much of a poet but I can clearly see another threat to our rights on the horizon.


  • 05/01/2026 10:34 AM | Anonymous

    April 2026 SCOPE Operations

        April 2026 proved to be a highly active and productive month for the Shooter’s Committee on Political Education (SCOPE), marked by significant organizational meetings, strategic planning efforts, leadership updates, and continued collaboration with allied Second Amendment organizations across New York State.  From voter mobilization initiatives and statewide chapter engagement to policy discussions and ongoing legal advocacy, SCOPE members and leadership remain focused on strengthening the organization’s mission and expanding its outreach in preparation for the critical 2026 election cycle and beyond.

        2026 is shaping up to be a pivotal political year both in New York State and across the country. In New York, the spotlight is on Governor Kathy Hochul as she seeks reelection. Her previous race in 2022 was notably competitive—Republican challenger Lee Zeldin came within just 378,000 votes of winning. Despite that close margin, the geographic breakdown tells a different story: Republicans carried 47 out of 62 counties, accounting for nearly 76% of the state. However, as is often the case, the population-heavy urban centers ultimately determined the outcome of the election. In light of this dynamic, there is a growing push for organizations across the state to mobilize voters and increase turnout. 

        At a recent meeting of the Steuben County SCOPE chapter, members explored strategies to increase voter turnout. Chapter member Steve Leonard stepped forward to lead a SCOPE Get Out the Vote initiative. The effort began on Saturday, April 11, when Leonard organized and led an all-day strategy session focused on voter mobilization.

        Attendees included Jack Prendergast, SCOPE Chairman; John Elwood, SCOPE President; Tom Reynolds, SCOPE Treasurer; a staff representative from Congresswoman Tenney’s office; Lynn Leonard, Vice President of the New York State Federation of Republican Women; and several members of the Steuben County SCOPE chapter. The session resulted in a preliminary plan to increase voter turnout, which was set to be presented at the All-Members meeting on Saturday, April 18, 2026. Among the proposals discussed was the creation of a marketing and communications director role within the SCOPE staff.  Steve Leonard volunteered his time and energy to become the SCOPE marketing and communication director and lead the “Get Out the Vote” initiative through the November 2026 election.

        SCOPE held its annual All-Members meeting along with its quarterly Board of Directors meeting on Saturday, April 18, 2026, at the Montour Falls Moose Lodge in Montour Falls, New York. Highlights of the All-Members session included guest appearances by Bruce Blakeman and his lieutenant governor running mate, Madison County Sheriff Todd Hood; a presentation by Steve Leonard outlining SCOPE’s Get Out the Vote plan; and an update from SCOPE President John Elwood on the organization’s accomplishments in 2025–2026 and its objectives for 2026–2027.

    The goals for the coming year include developing and implementing a social media strategy, strengthening coordination with other Second Amendment organizations across New York State, launching a Get Out the Vote initiative, continuing efforts to educate both policymakers and the public on firearms legislation, and contributing to legal efforts supporting Second Amendment rights in the state. Members also elected Tom Reynolds, Jim Tuttle, Carrie Christmas, and John Elwood as At-large directors.  Joe Atkinson, an At-large director is currently in his second year of a two year At-large term.  Approximately the 140 attendees enjoyed lunch. 

        Bruce Blakeman and Todd Hood expressed strong support for the Second Amendment. Blakeman emphasized his backing of law enforcement and said he would use executive orders to bring New York State firearms laws into alignment with the U.S. Constitution. When asked whether a Blakeman–Hood administration would support a ban on AR-15s and high-capacity magazines, Mr. Hood responded, “Absolutely not.” Both Blakeman and Hood spent a lot of time answering questions from the audience.

        The SCOPE Board of Directors met during the afternoon session, addressing several key items. These included a “Get Out the Vote” presentation by Steve Leonard, the SCOPE corporate election, approval of an updated Code of Conduct and Asset Inventory policy along with its accompanying form, an update on the Gazzola lawsuit supported by SCOPE, and a brief report on the upcoming SCOPE banquet scheduled for Saturday, September 26, at the Palmyra VFW in Palmyra, New York.

        In addition, the board approved the creation of a new staff role—SCOPE Marketing and Communications (MAR/COM) Director—and subsequently appointed Steve Leonard as the first to serve in that position.

        The results of the SCOPE corporate election are as follows: Jack Prendergast was elected Chairman, John Elwood as President, Gary Zielenski as Secretary, and Tom Reynolds as Treasurer. No additional nominations were received for any of the positions.

        At the same time, there is a clear need for more members to step forward and volunteer for leadership roles within the organization. The current leadership pipeline is very limited, with many corporate and chapter officers serving in their positions for years. While SCOPE has experienced growth in the number of chapters in recent years, at least one chapter is now closing due to a lack of members willing to run for office.

        I continue to attend SCOPE county chapter meetings, with the goal of visiting every chapter by March 2027. These visits are designed to help keep members informed about developments in lawsuits, organizational issues, and firearms legislation, while also gathering membership input on ways to strengthen SCOPE. My most recent visits were to the Steuben County chapter on Monday, April 6, 2026, and the Jefferson/Lewis County chapter of SCOPE on April 20, 2026.

         SCOPE corporate officers continue to engage with leaders of other Second Amendment organizations across New York State to coordinate efforts and messaging. On Tuesday, April 21, 2026, I met with Frank Panasuk, President of the 1791 Society, and we agreed to collaborate on as many initiatives as possible.  

        Arrangements were made for SCOPE corporate leadership to provide a briefing to New York State Assembly Leader Ed Ra on SCOPE’s “Top Ten Most Egregious Firearms Legislation” in New York State. Several potential dates in May are currently being finalized.

        Finally, the quarterly gun raffle was conducted on April 10 at 1:00 PM. 

        As April 2026 comes to a close, SCOPE remains actively engaged in strengthening its organizational structure, expanding member and chapter participation, and advancing its mission through coordinated advocacy, voter outreach, and legislative awareness efforts.  The month’s meetings, initiatives, and leadership decisions reflect a continued emphasis on preparation for the 2026 election cycle and long-term organizational sustainability.  With ongoing collaboration among county chapters, allied organizations, and dedicated volunteers, SCOPE is well positioned to build on its momentum in the months ahead while further promoting its goals across New York State.

    With All Honor and Respect,
    John

    John R. Elwood
    SCOPE President


<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 

A 2nd Amendment Defense Organization, defending the rights of New York State gun owners to keep and bear arms!

PO Box 165
East Aurora, NY 14052

SCOPE is a 501(c)4 non-profit organization.

{ Site Design & Development By Motorhead Digital }

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software